Silverfast vs vuescan12/2/2023 In the end it is not what is better or best, but you think it best suits the photo. It doesn’t make although a world of difference. The intervention of NegativeLabPro makes the colors appear a bit more neutral, more sharp and more contrasting. Scanning negatives with the built-in color profiles, adding sharpness goes well in both packages and with Silverfast also a bit faster. Both Epsonscanner and Silverfast have excellent solutions for this, but only for the TIFF variants. ![]() What certainly does not work are the RAW files with no possibility of improving dust, scratches and dirt on the negatives. Cons: tends to create color casts but weaker ones than SilverFast, least set of correction options, non-intuitive user interface, hanged my scanner many times during tests (SilverFast and Minolta DS Utility hanged it just once). But straight from the scanner, the negafix for me does not set the light right, the colors although seem fairly accurate. VueScan Professional Pros: one version works with any scanner. Of course this can be edited in Silverfast or other editors. Negative scan with Negafix Kodak Portra 160Īlthough these are fascinating scans, the light does not reflect the actual situation as I remember it, it looks too dark.In both cases we used Digital Ice.įinally what about just scanning with Silverfast? ![]() Each upper photo, the negative is scanned as positive (without Epson’s color profile, without added sharpness) and in Lightroom as TIFF converted to positive with NegativeLabPro. In the three examples, the bottom photo in each slider set are the result of a ‘normal’ negative scan, with Epson controlling the sharpness and colors (2400 Dpi). But most of all, Digital Ice technology completes the software because it reduces dust, scratches and stains to a minimum. Many settings are available to adjust sharpness and colors. First we show you three examples of working with the Epson Scansoftware that comes with the scanner.Īs discussed earlier, this software is very suitable for making high-quality scans. We did however not use VueScan for our review, since Silverfast is in our opinion upfront more versatile software. In addition, all packages work together with the (separately to purchase) plugin for Lightroom, NegativeLabPro. The most commonly used software packages are Epson Scan, VueScan and Silverfast. Earlier we reviewed the V600, an excellent entry-level scanner, but in order to also work with large format negatives, we have to upgrade to the 7 or 8 series. For our examples, we use the Epson Perfection V850. With VueScan I had some trouble making it scan two frames at a time, Silverfast I haven't tried yet.After our earlier article on scan software, requests came in to also show some examples of the differences between Epson, Silverfast and in conjunction with Negativelabpro plugin for Adobe Lightroom. One of VueScans advantages compared with SilverFast is that you dont need a separate program to post-process the image. I wouldn't mind investing into another program to scan, as long as I it gives me better results. The question now is, would Silverfast or VueScan offer better results than the combination of the crappy Cyberview together with Lightroom? Is the quality of the 16-bit full resolution Tiff as good as it gets or can other programs get better base-data to work with? Then I import the Tiff-files into Lightroom for further processing. With my digital camera I use mainly Lightroom.Īt the moment I can the images at the maximum resolution of 3200 dpi into 16-bit Tiff-files with the software that came with the scanner (CyberView X5). The whole process isn't really fast, but I'm not in a big hurry. Also, the scanner I have either lets me scan one or two frames before I need to change position or reload the film-holder. I don't have a big archive to scan, basically I'm only processing only films whenever they drop out of processing, mostly black and white, but some colour will be coming soon too. I just got a film-scanner and wonder, what combination of software best to use. Perhaps someone has some experience to help me along. ![]() I'm new here and starting right off with a question.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |